---¶
Verification Standards¶
Every. Claim. Gets. Verified.¶
The Three-Source Rule¶
No claim is published as fact unless verified by three independent sources.
| Sources | Classification | Publication Standard |
|---|---|---|
| 1 source | Rumor/Lead | Not published as fact. Queued for investigation. |
| 2 sources | Probable | Published with "PROBABLE" tag and caveats. |
| 3+ sources | Verified | Published as verified fact with confidence level. |
"Independent" means the sources do not cite each other. A DOJ press release and three news articles that all quote the DOJ press release count as one source, not four.
Confidence Levels¶
Every dossier and report carries a confidence assessment:
HIGH Confidence¶
- 3+ independent sources confirm all major claims
- Government documents support timeline
- No significant contradicting evidence
- Medical/legal details consistent across sources
MEDIUM Confidence¶
- 2-3 sources confirm major claims
- Some details unverified or from single source
- Minor inconsistencies between sources (dates, ages)
- Core facts solid, peripheral details uncertain
LOW Confidence¶
- Fewer than 3 sources for major claims
- Significant gaps in timeline
- Contradicting accounts from different sources
- Published with explicit caveats about uncertainty
What Gets Verified¶
For every death/incident, we verify:
| Element | Minimum Sources | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Name of victim | 3 | Spelling may vary across sources |
| Date of death/incident | 3 | Compare government vs. media dates |
| Age | 2 | Minor discrepancies common |
| Nationality/citizenship | 2 | Government records preferred |
| Location/facility | 3 | Cross-reference with facility databases |
| Cause of death | 2+ | Official cause vs. independent findings |
| Circumstances | 3+ | Timeline from multiple perspectives |
| Facility operator | 2 | Contract records, news reporting |
Verification Techniques¶
Cross-Reference Check¶
Compare the same fact across multiple independent sources. Look for:
- Consistent details (dates, names, locations)
- Additional details that complement without contradicting
- Different perspectives (government vs. media vs. advocacy)
Timeline Reconstruction¶
Build a timeline from all available sources:
- Government press releases (official dates/times)
- News reporting (additional details, witness accounts)
- Court documents (legal timeline)
- Medical records (when available via reporting)
Gaps in timeline are flagged explicitly.
Source Reliability Assessment¶
Not all sources are equal:
- Government sources: Reliable for facts (arrests, charges), unreliable for framing/narrative
- Major media: Generally reliable, may follow government framing
- Local media: Often most accurate for on-ground details
- Advocacy groups: Reliable for context, may have political framing
- Social media: Unreliable without corroboration, useful for leads
Red Flags¶
We watch for:
- Single-source claims presented as fact elsewhere
- Circular sourcing (outlets citing each other citing same original)
- Government narrative contradicted by physical evidence
- "Suicide" classifications without independent investigation
- Significant delays between death and public disclosure
Corrections Policy¶
When we get something wrong:
- Immediate correction — The incorrect information is updated
- Transparent notation — A correction note is added explaining what changed and why
- Source update — New sources are documented
- No silent edits — Every change is tracked via version control
Limitations We Acknowledge¶
What We Can't Verify
- Inside detention facilities: We have no direct access. We rely on inspection reports, lawsuits, and detainee accounts reported through media.
- Medical records: Full records are rarely public. We analyze what's reported.
- Government internal communications: We don't have access to internal ICE/CBP communications unless released via FOIA or litigation.
- Deportation destinations: What happens after deportation flights land is extremely difficult to track.
- Full death count: ICE may not disclose all deaths promptly. Our count is a minimum.
We are honest about what we know and what we don't. Uncertainty is documented, not hidden.